Incorporation of novel meals in European diets can scale back world warming potential, water use and land use by over 80%

The State of Meals and Agriculture (FAO, 2019); http://www.fao.org/3/ca6030en/ca6030en.pdf

Campbell, B. M. et al. Agriculture manufacturing as a significant driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. 22, 8 (2017).

Crippa, M. et al. Meals techniques are answerable for a 3rd of world anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Meals 2, 198–209 (2021).

Double-Responsibility Actions for Vitamin: Coverage Transient (World Well being Group, 2017).

Springmann, M. et al. Well being and dietary points of sustainable weight loss program methods and their affiliation with environmental impacts: a world modelling evaluation with country-level element. Lancet Planet. Well being 2, e451–e461 (2018).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Clark, M. A., Springmann, M., Hill, J. & Tilman, D. A number of well being and environmental impacts of meals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23357–23362 (2019).

CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Willett, W. et al. Meals within the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Fee on wholesome diets from sustainable meals techniques. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).

Parodi, A. et al. The potential of future meals for sustainable and wholesome diets. Nat. Maintain. 1, 782–789 (2018).

Article

Google Scholar

Publish, M. J. et al. Scientific, sustainability and regulatory challenges of cultured meat. Nat. Meals 1, 403–415 (2020).

Article

Google Scholar

Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J. & Dagevos, H. A scientific assessment on client acceptance of other proteins: pulses, algae, bugs, plant-based meat options, and cultured meat. Urge for food 159, 105058 (2021).

CAS
Article
PubMed

Google Scholar

Kim, B. F. et al. Nation-specific dietary shifts to mitigate local weather and water crises. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 101926 (2019).

Perignon, M. et al. How low can dietary greenhouse gasoline emissions be decreased with out impairing dietary adequacy, affordability and acceptability of the weight loss program? A modelling examine to information sustainable meals selections. Public Well being Nutr. 19, 2662–2674 (2016).

Article
PubMed

Google Scholar

Springmann, M., Godfray, H. C. J., Rayner, M. & Scarborough, P. Evaluation and valuation of the well being and local weather change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4146–4151 (2016).

CAS
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Saxe, H., Larsen, T. M. & Mogensen, L. The worldwide warming potential of two wholesome Nordic diets in contrast with the typical Danish weight loss program. Climatic Change 116, 249–262 (2013).

Article
ADS

Google Scholar

Ulaszewska, M. M., Luzzani, G., Pignatelli, S. & Capri, E. Evaluation of diet-related GHG emissions utilizing the environmental hourglass strategy for the Mediterranean and new Nordic diets. Sci. Complete Environ. 574, 829–836 (2017).

CAS
Article
ADS
PubMed

Google Scholar

van Dooren, C., Marinussen, M., Blonk, H., Aiking, H. & Vellinga, P. Exploring dietary pointers based mostly on ecological and dietary values: a comparability of six dietary patterns. Meals Coverage 44, 36–46 (2014).

Article

Google Scholar

Mertens, E. et al. Dietary selections and environmental influence in 4 European nations. J. Clear. Prod. 237, 117827 (2019).

Article

Google Scholar

Vieux, F., Perignon, M., Gazan, R. & Darmon, N. Dietary modifications wanted to enhance weight loss program sustainability: are they comparable throughout Europe? Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 72, 951–960 (2018).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Gazan, R. et al. Mathematical optimization to discover tomorrow’s sustainable diets: a story assessment. Adv. Nutr. 9, 602–616 (2018).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Meier, T. & Christen, O. Environmental impacts of dietary suggestions and dietary types: Germany for instance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 877–888 (2013).

CAS
Article
ADS
PubMed

Google Scholar

van Kernebeek, H. R. J., Oosting, S. J., van Ittersum, M. Okay., Bikker, P. & de Boer, I. J. M. Saving land to feed a rising inhabitants: penalties for consumption of crop and livestock merchandise. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 677–687 (2016).

Gephart, J. A. et al. The environmental value of subsistence: optimizing diets to attenuate footprints. Sci. Complete Environ. 553, 120–127 (2016).

CAS
Article
ADS
PubMed

Google Scholar

Wilson, N., Cleghorn, C. L., Cobiac, L. J., Mizdrak, A. & Nghiem, N. Reaching wholesome and sustainable diets: a assessment of the outcomes of latest mathematical optimization research. Adv. Nutr. 10, S389–S403 (2019).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Röös, E. et al. Grasping or needy? Land use and local weather impacts of meals in 2050 underneath totally different livestock futures. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 1–12 (2017).

Article

Google Scholar

Tyszler, M., Kramer, G. & Blonk, H. Simply consuming more healthy just isn’t sufficient: learning the environmental influence of various weight loss program eventualities for Dutch girls (31–50 years previous) by linear programming. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 701–709 (2016).

Article

Google Scholar

Thornton, P. Okay. Livestock manufacturing: latest tendencies, future prospects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2853–2867 (2010).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Cobiac, L. J. & Scarborough, P. Modelling the well being co-benefits of sustainable diets within the UK, France, Finland, Italy and Sweden. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 624–633 (2019).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Siegrist, M. & Hartmann, C. Perceived naturalness, disgust, belief and meals neophobia as predictors of cultured meat acceptance in ten nations. Urge for food 155, 104814 (2020).

Article
PubMed

Google Scholar

Tzachor, A., Richards, C. E. & Holt, L. Future meals for risk-resilient diets. Nat. Meals 2, 326–329 (2021).

Bryant, C. & Barnett, J. Client acceptance of cultured meat: an up to date assessment (2018–2020). Appl. Sci. 10, 5201 (2020).

Gazan, R. et al. A technique to compile meals metrics associated to weight loss program sustainability right into a single meals database: software to the French case. Meals Chem. 238, 125–133 (2018).

CAS
Article
PubMed

Google Scholar

O’Mahony, C. & Vilone, G. Compiled European meals consumption database. EFSA Assist. Publ. 10, 415E (2013).

Google Scholar

The EFSA Complete European Meals Consumption Database—European Union Open Information Portal v.2020 (EFSA, 2018); https://knowledge.europa.eu/euodp/en/knowledge/dataset/the-efsa-comprehensive-european-food-consumption-database

FoodData Central (USDA, 2018); https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/index.html

ISO 14040: Environmental Administration—Life Cycle Evaluation—Rules and Framework (Worldwide Group for Standardization, 2006).

Guinee, J. B. et al. Life cycle evaluation: previous, current, and future. ACS Publ. 45, 90–96 (2011).

AGRIBALYSE 3.0: Agricultural and Meals Database for French Merchandise and Meals LCA v.2020 (French Company for Ecological Transition, 2020); https://simapro.com/merchandise/agribalyse-agricultural-database/

OpenLCA v.1.10.3 (GreenDelta, 2007)

LCIA: The ReCiPe Mannequin (Nationwide Institute for Public Well being and the Setting Netherlands, 2011); https://www.rivm.nl/en/life-cycle-assessment-lca/recipe

Boulay, A.-M. et al. The WULCA consensus characterization mannequin for water shortage footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based mostly on obtainable water remaining (AWARE). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 368–378 (2018).

Article

Google Scholar

Voutilainen, E., Pihlajaniemi, V. & Parviainen, T. Financial comparability of meals protein manufacturing with single-cell organisms from lignocellulose side-streams. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 14, 100683 (2021).

Järviö, N., Maljanen, N.-L., Kobayashi, Y., Ryynänen, T. & Tuomisto, H. L. An attributional life cycle evaluation of microbial protein manufacturing: a case examine on utilizing hydrogen-oxidizing micro organism. Sci. Complete Environ. 776, 145764 (2021).

Smetana, S., Sandmann, M., Rohn, S., Pleissner, D. & Heinz, V. Autotrophic and heterotrophic microalgae and cyanobacteria cultivation for meals and feed: life cycle evaluation. Bioresour. Technol. 245, 162–170 (2017).

CAS
Article
PubMed

Google Scholar

Smetana, S., Schmitt, E. & Mathys, A. Sustainable use of Hermetia illucens insect biomass for feed and meals: attributional and consequential life cycle evaluation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 144, 285–296 (2019).

Article

Google Scholar

Kobyashi, Y. & Tuomisto, H. L. Plant cell tradition life cycle evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. (within the press).

Järviö, N. et al. Ovalbumin manufacturing utilizing Trichoderma reesei tradition and low-carbon power might mitigate the environmental impacts of chicken-egg-derived ovalbumin. Nat. Meals 2, 1005–1013 (2021).

Tuomisto, H. L., Allan, S. J. & Ellis, M. J. Potential life cycle evaluation of a whole bioprocess design for aesthetic meat manufacturing in hole fiber bioreactor. Nat. Meals (within the press).

Comparative GHG Emissions Evaluation of Good Day Whey Protein Manufacturing to Dairy Protein (Good Day, 2021).

SimaPro v.9.1.1 (PRé Consultants, 2020).

Karlsson Potter, H., Lundmark, L. & Röös, E. Environmental Impression of Plant-Based mostly Meals – Information Assortment for the Growth of a Client Information for Plant-Based mostly Meals (Swedish College of Agricultural Sciences, SLU, 2020); https://pub.epsilon.slu.se/17699/1/Report112.pdf

Jolliet, O. et al. IMPACT 2002: a brand new life cycle influence evaluation methodology. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8, 324–330 (2003).

Article

Google Scholar

Yang, X. in From Linear Programming to Metaheuristics 67-78 (Cambridge Worldwide Science Publishing Ltd., 2008).

Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Vitamin Suggestions 2012: Integrating Vitamin and Bodily Exercise (Nordisk Ministerråd, 2014).

Protein and Amino Acid Necessities in Human Vitamin World Well being Group Technical Report Sequence 1 (FAO/WHO, 2007).

European Meals Security Administration. Steering on chosen default values for use by the EFSA Scientific Committee, Scientific Panels and Models within the absence of precise measured knowledge. EFSA J. 10, 2579 (2012).

Siva Kiran, R. R., Madhu, G. M. & Satyanarayana, S. V. Spirulina in combating protein power malnutrition (PEM) and protein power losing (PEW)—a assessment. J. Nutr. Res. 3, 62–79 (2015).

Google Scholar

Nordlund, E. et al. Plant cells as meals—an idea taking form. Meals Res. Int. 107, 297–305 (2018).

CAS
Article
PubMed

Google Scholar

Cherry, P., O’hara, C., Magee, P. J., Mcsorley, E. M. & Allsopp, P. J. Dangers and advantages of consuming edible seaweeds. Nutr. Rev. 77, 307–329 (2019).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Elorinne, A.-L. et al. Meals and nutrient consumption and dietary standing of Finnish vegans and non-vegetarians. PLoS ONE 11, e0148235 (2016).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Heijungs, R. On the variety of Monte Carlo runs in comparative probabilistic LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 25, 394–402 (2020).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Henriksson, P. J. G., Zhang, W. & Guinée, J. B. Up to date unit course of knowledge for coal-based power in China together with parameters for general dispersions. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 185–195 (2015).

CAS
Article

Google Scholar

Karlsson, J. O., Carlsson, G., Lindberg, M., Sjunnestrand, T. & Röös, E. Designing a future meals imaginative and prescient for the Nordics by way of a participatory modeling strategy. Agron. Maintain. Dev. 38, pp.1–10 (2018).

Eustachio Colombo, P., Patterson, E., Lindroos, A. Okay., Parlesak, A. & Elinder, L. S. Sustainable and acceptable faculty meals by way of optimization evaluation: an intervention examine. Nutr. J. 19, 1–15 (2020).

Article

Google Scholar